Appeals court grants Legoland opponents clear-cutting stay


Make text smaller Make text larger



Photos



  • This Legoland opponent at a recent vigil for a sycamore cut at the Legoland site (Photo by Frances Ruth Harris)



GOSHEN — The Supreme Court of New York appeals court on Tuesday afternoon approved a request to restrain clear-cutting at the Legoland New York theme park site in the Town of Goshen.

“We now prevailed and the stay against clearcutting has been extended per the order we received today," said Jonathan R. Goldman, associate attorney at the office of Sussman & Associates in Goshen, which is representing the Concerned Citizens for the Hudson Valley in its suit against the Town of Goshen. “This was entered over strenuous opposition by (the) Town and Merlin."

The court on Tuesday ordered that Merlin Entertainments Group, Legoland's parent company, “is stayed from engaging in clear cutting activities at the project site that is the subject of the underlying article 78 proceeding, either pending hearing and determination of the appeal or determination by the Supreme Court, Orange County, of the motion that was initiated by the order to show cause dated Jan. 4, 2018, whichever occurs first."

Phil Royle, director of development for Legoland New York, said in a statement on Wednesday, “We are confident the papers we have submitted to the court will demonstrate we have followed every Town of Goshen requirement that led to the town’s issuance of the proper permits to clear trees on the property, which we now own. Our tree clearing plan has been re-verified in all of our approved permit applications. We are equally confident that once this review is completed, the Temporary Restraining Order (TRO) will be dismissed."

Sussman's office said the stay will “‘end' only if the supreme court justice denies the preliminary injunction we are seeking; if that were to occur, we will seek further stay from second department."

The group is also suing for a town referendum of the sale of a town-owned parcel.

Sussman had filed a brief on Jan. 4 that stated, in part, that the Town of Goshen's approval process was sullied by “bad faith and pre-judgment," including improperly delegating lead agency status for zoning changes to the planning board, engaging in “prohibited segmentation” of the site, failing to study the impact of the re-zoning on more than 370 acres not planned for immediate development. The project also lacks an adequate and reliable water supply, the brief says.

Make text smaller Make text larger

Comments

Pool Rules



MUST READ NEWS

SUNY Orange announces spring classes in Port Jervis
, N.Y. — SUNY Orange will kick off its revitalized presence in Port Jervis this spring by offering four evening classes.
Two...

Read more »
Image

Sugar's 'tipping point' link to Alzheimer's disease revealed
For the first time, a "tipping point" molecular link between the blood sugar glucose and Alzheimer's disease has been established by scientists, who have shown that...
Read more »
Image

College Admissions Expert Elizabeth Levine: More Aid and Less Loans
About 6 dozen college's have implemented a "No Loans" financial aid policy. Click
Read more »
Image

Tax Expert Noel Spencer: Stop Smoking Program Medical Deduction
Yes, a stop-smoking program is a deductible medical expense that does not have to be prescribed by a doctor However, you cannot include in medical expenses amounts you pay for...
Read more »
Image

VIDEOS



* indicates required
Community Newspapers


MOST COMMENTED



Find more about Weather in Chester, NY